Critically evaluate the scenarios  based upon the following points:Critically evaluate the sample size.Critically evaluate the statements for meaningfulness.Critically evaluate the statements for statistical significance.Based on your evaluation, provide an explanation of the implications for social change.Scenarios1. The p-value was slightly above conventional threshold, but was described as “rapidly approaching significance” (i.e., p =.06).An independent samples t test was used to determine whether student satisfaction levels in a quantitative reasoning course differed between the traditional classroom and on-line environments. The samples consisted of students in four face-to-face classes at a traditional state university (n = 65) and four online classes offered at the same university (n = 69). Students reported their level of satisfaction on a five- point scale, with higher values indicating higher levels of satisfaction. Since the study was exploratory in nature, levels of significance were relaxed to the .10 level. The test was significant t(132) = 1.8, p = .074, wherein students in the face-to-face class reported lower levels of satisfaction (M = 3.39, SD = 1.8) than did those in the online sections (M = 3.89, SD = 1.4). We therefore conclude that on average, students in online quantitative reasoning classes have higher levels of satisfaction. The results of this study are significant because they provide educators with evidence of what medium works better in producing quantitatively knowledgeable practitioners.2. Statistical significance is found in a study, but the effect in reality is very small (i.e., there was a very minor difference in attitude between men and women). Were the results meaningful?An independent samples t test was conducted to determine whether differences exist between men and women on cultural competency scores. The samples consisted of 663 women and 650 men taken from a convenience sample of public, private, and non-profit organizations. Each participant was administered an instrument that measured his or her current levels of cultural competency. The cultural competency score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating higher levels of cultural competency. The descriptive statistics indicate women have higher levels of cultural competency (M = 9.2, SD = 3.2) than men (M = 8.9, SD = 2.1). The results were significant t (1311) = 2.0, p 

EDUC 880 Prospectus: Part 2 – Introduction Assignment InstructionsOverviewThis assignment is linked to the development of your capstone project.InstructionsThe candidate will submit a well-developed draft of the Introduction section, expanding upon the previous Part 1 submission, now including the significance of the problem, purpose statement, central research question, and definitions, and a reference page. The submission must follow the requirements described in detail within the course textbook, and especially the section checklists. The Applied Research Report Example chapter is extremely useful and can be found in the course textbook.  Do not remove any of the sections developed in the Prospectus: Part 1 assignment. The Prospectus: Part 2 – Introduction draft will add a minimum of 2 full pages to the existing text, excluding the title and reference pages and Part 1 pages. The submission must include at least 4 additional unique sources/citations, which are also properly listed on a reference page at the end of the submission (total of 8 sources minimum), using proper APA format.Read: Claxton & Michael: Chapter 4