1. Personal Reflection Question

Personal Reflection Question – Total Marks 20 (max word limit- 300)

1. Imagine yourself as an entrepreneur of ABC LTD. ABC Ltd is a new startup dealing with high-end -organic products ( FMCG). The firm has completed 5 successful years. Based on    the given scenario- answer the following questions

a)What kind of budgeting practice do you prefer for your company and why? (10 Marks, 150 Words)

b) You have the intention of investing in a new product line. Discuss your choice of any 2 Capital Budgeting Methods and provide justification for the same.(10 Marks, 150 Words)

1. Types of Insurance to be discussed

  1. Insurance, including all of the types of insurance listed below in #1 and all of the insurance factors below in #2.
  2. Investing, including all of the investment factors listed in #3 below.

Insurance

  1. Types of Insurance to be discussed (make a heading for each of the types of insurance in your discussion)
  • Auto, including COLLISION, COMPREHENSIVE, LIABILITY
  • Health
  • Homeowners or renters (whichever applies to you)
  • Life (compare whole life with term life and which do you think is better)
  1. Factors to discuss for each type of insurance:
  • Insurance type
  • Type of loss covered
  • Likelihood that your financial health would be in jeopardy if the insured event occurs (consider the greatest type of event covered by each insurance – for example, your car is totaled). Where could you get a start at identifying values?
  • Likelihood that you and your family may encounter this type of loss.
  • Is this type of insurance required by any aspect of Government, your bank, or other legally binding requirement?
  • Why you should or should not purchase this type of insurance.

Investing

  1. Read the Module 2 Case Background information and pay attention to areas relating to the questions below.

(Note – the Investopedia sections that relate to the topics are in parentheses after the questions.)

  1. How would you characterize your risk tolerance? (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/risktolerance.asp)
  2. Give a brief description of Bonds, Stocks, Mutual funds, and one Alternative Investment (https://www.investopedia.com/articles/basics/11/3-s-simple-investing.asp)
  3. Briefly explain diversification in the context of an individual’s investment portfolio (https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/diversification.asp).

1. For this discussion find an article

For this discussion find an article,

video segment, or another type of source in which a developmental theory is discussed, evaluated, demonstrated, etc.  In your main post, you need to identify the source in an APA style reference or link. Summarize the main points and how the theory or model is explained and how it fits into the developmental theory category.  Provide your opinion regarding the value of this theory or model. What weak points do you perceive?  An example would be something like a youtube presentation evaluating and explaining a developmental perspective or an article/study by a criminologist.

Submit the main post, with a heading. Your main post should be substantive and 500-word minimum. Be clear and concise.

 

1. evidenced-based practices to improve employee commitment

Describe the application of evidenced-based practices to improve employee commitment,

attitudes, and motivation in the workplace. Evaluate how you would use this as an I-O psychology professional. Discuss what tools and resources you will use to help stay current with the latest scientific research in the field on workplace motivation.

1. Explain why the assumptions of human nature resonate with you.

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words: Explain why the assumptions of human nature resonate with you.

  • Explain why the assumptions of human nature resonate with you.
  • Consider your personality, cultural experience and background, and worldview. How do these factors influence your choice? Include an example of this assumption of human nature in action in your life.

1. 1,050- to 1,400-w0rd pap3r explaining the theory/theories

1,050- to 1,400-w0rd pap3r explaining the theory/theories (i.e., Adlerian, person-centered, gestalt, CBT/REBT, reality, narrative, or solution-focused theories) you prefer the most. In your pap3r, be sure to:

  • Summarize the theory/theories.
  • Include definitions and examples where appropriate.
  • Explain your rationale for this choice.
  • What draws you to this theory? Support your response with details related to human nature, key concepts, and your role in the therapeutic relationship?
  • What parts of the theory are most appealing to you? Which parts are least appealing? Why?
  • Compare your chosen theory to another counseling theory you learned in this course.
  • Describe how this theory is closely related to your chosen theory. How does it differ?
  • Describe how you would apply your chosen theory to address a mental health issue.
  • What might be the advantages and limitations of your theory as you apply the theory to the mental health issue you have chosen?
  • Describe what you have learned from completing this assignment in your conclusion.
  • Incorporate research from current, scholarly references to support your response.

Note: Use the topics above as headings in your pap3r.

1. Do you agree with the Stossel report?

The John Stossel video segment argues that strict gun control does not reduce gun violence because criminals do not use legal means to obtain firearms and citizens are left vulnerable.  Please discuss your view of current gun control regulations and the right of citizens to be armed.  Do you agree with the Stossel report?  Why or why not?  Please explain your view and provide any examples from your personal experiences.  Do you believe the culture in the U.S. is more violent than cultures in other nations in Europe where guns are much more regulated?  Discuss the disparity in violent crime rates in Europe, where gun control is stronger, and the U.S.

Submit the main post, with a heading. Your main post should be substantive and 500-word minimum. Be clear and concise.

 

 Gun Violence Presentation

For this forum we examine we explore the gun control debate.  Watch the following:

John Stossel Links Gun Control to Higher Crime Rates

 

1. Describe what a fluid and electrolyte imbalance is?

Your written assignment for this module should be a 1-2 page paper (not including title page and reference page) that describes the following:

  • Describe what a fluid and electrolyte imbalance is and how this is important to the function of the body?
  • Pick a fluid or electrolyte imbalance and describe how the patient would present, in addition to the treatment (nursing and expected medical)?

 

You should include a minimum of 3 scholarly references. Include a title page, in-text citations, and a reference page in APA format.

 

1. You have been asked by the FixIt! Consulting Team leader to address three questions in the Final Report.

Assessment 2b: Case Business Report (40%)

Articulate key insights and provide recommendations to the UNSW Business School Career Accelerator team on what it needs to do to address the low Excel Certification completion problem. You have been asked by the FixIt! Consulting Team leader to address three questions in the Final Report. You are required to use different problem-solving toolboxes to address these three questions.

 

1.       FixIt! ‘Ethics toolbox’

This section of the report is approximately 600 words (guide only, not a word limit).

Recall that the FixIt! Consulting Team is concerned with the problem of low ECT participation and the ethical issues it presents. Apply the 7-step ethical decision-making framework from Week 3 to one of the following ethical dilemmas:

  • Making the Excel Certification Test (ECT) a 20% component of the course grade, so the maximum mark students can receive without completing the ECT is 80% (i.e. this would replace the non- invigilated Assessments 1a and 1b).
  • Providing additional financial incentives (e.g. financial incentives like a $50 gift card) for students who pass the Excel Certification Test (ECT).

For the ethical dilemma you are writing up, apply the 7-step ethics decision-making framework (week 3) to formulate a position on the ethical issue selected. You should follow all 7 steps in the ethical decision-making framework.

Your position on the ethical issue is step 7 in the framework; the other steps enable you to provide evidence for that focus. The FixIt! Consulting Team Leader wants you to be explicit about the rigorous FixIt! Process, therefore, explicitly refer to each step in the ethical decision-making framework (e.g. put ‘Step 2’ to refer to the information you are drawing from Step 2 about ‘assumptions and world views’).

 

2.      FixIt! ‘Information toolbox’

This section of the report is approximately 700 words (guide only, not a word limit).

  • The Project Team Leader wants to see how you structure your arguments. Provide a situation-observation-resolution story summary (see Week 10 Lecture), and choose the appropriate visual representation (i.e. either a grouping structure graph or an argument structure graph, see Week 10 Lecture) to present your argument structure (e.g. show how you organise your arguments and the report storyline on what is the issue, what are your findings, and your recommendations on how to fix it).

When constructing your grouping or argument structure graph, you need to consolidate all relevant evidence, including your logic tree analysis in the Briefing Pack (Assessment 2a of this Case), the literature identified in the Briefing Pack (Assessment 2a), statistical information from your analysis in the Briefing Pack (Assessment 2a) and this report (i.e., Assessment 2b of this Case), and the ethical dilemma in this report (i.e., Assessment 2b).

 

  • Follow your argument structure, put forward your recommendations as to what the UNSW Business School Career Accelerator team should do to address the low Excel Certification completion Justify the recommendation. Then put forward actionable next steps for the Career Accelerator team (e.g. what exactly the Career Accelerator team needs to do?)
  • Ensure the recommendation and action steps utilise persuasive yet still factually accurate communication. This includes ensuring appropriate presentation of results, and persuasive language.
  • Assumptions and limitations also need to be explicitly identified, including any issues about statistical & decision-making biases in your analysis (week 4 and 8-10); any reliability and validity concerns (Week 10); and alerting the FixIt! Consulting Team Leader of any ethical issues (Week 3) that may arise if your recommendations are adopted by the UNSW Business School Career Accelerator

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria 2a

%

Fail Pass Credit Distinction High Distinction
1. Statistical problem-solving.

Application of the statistical toolkit

40% Does not apply statistical problem-solving tools to the Case, or application is inaccurate. Applies statistical problem- solving tools to the Case appropriately but may include minor errors or omissions. Accurately applies statistical problem- solving tools to the Case. Accurately and insightfully applies statistical problem- solving tools to the Case. Accurately and insightfully applies statistical problem-solving tools to the Case highlighting novel insights with extension material from the course.
2. Ethical decision- making

Application of ethical decision-making rubric to the factual details of your chosen dilemma, including quality of analysis with those facts.

25% Multiple errors or limited articulation of how ethical decision-making rubric is applied to the factual details of the dilemma.

Poor analysis, missing/gaps in evidence.

Some articulation/ application of how ethical decision-making rubric is applied to the factual details of the dilemma.

Some analysis and reflection but patchy evidence.

Accurate and clear articulation of how the ethical decision-making rubric is applied to the factual details of the dilemma. Clear analysis and reflection, with some evidence. Accurate and comprehensive articulation of how the ethical decision- making rubric is applied to the factual details of the dilemma. Consistent and detailed analysis, deep reflection supported by sound evidence. Insightful and detailed application of how the ethical decision- making rubric is applied to the factual details of the dilemma.

Insightful and detailed analysis and reflection with extensive evidence.

3. Information problem-solving

Application of the information toolkit into well-structured arguments

35% Does not apply information problem- solving tools to the Case, or application is inaccurate. Unclear writing style, which distracts from arguments. Applies information problem-solving tools to the Case appropriately but may include minor errors or omissions. Generally, clear writing style so main arguments articulated. Accurately applies information problem- solving tools to the Case. Generally, expresses complex ideas into well-reasoned arguments. Accurately and insightfully applies information problem-solving tools to the Case. Consistently and skillfully represents complex ideas into well- reasoned arguments. Accurately and insightfully applies information problem-solving tools to the Case demonstrating breadth and depth of analysis.

Consistently and eloquently represents complex ideas into well-reasoned arguments.

 

 

1. Select appropriate nursing interventions for clients with lower gastrointestinal disorders.

Competency

Select appropriate nursing interventions for clients with lower gastrointestinal disorders.

 

Scenario

Patient and family education is important in increasing adherence. To provide education to patient and families, you are going to create a poster about a gastrointestinal disorder that will be displayed in a physician’s office.

 

Instructions

Please be sure to include the following in your poster design.

  • Overview of the disorder
  • Causes of the disorder
  • Diagnostic tests to diagnosis the disorder
  • Assessment findings
  • Multidimensional nursing care interventions for the disorder

Resources

For assistance with research, refer to the Nursing Research Guide.

 

For assistance creating a poster, refer to the following FAQ.

 

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

 

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504