Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
PSY 634 Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: Submit a rough draft of your case application paper. Your rough draft should include all of the following aspects of the final submission:
Save your time - order a paper!
Get your paper written from scratch within the tight deadline. Our service is a reliable solution to all your troubles. Place an order on any task and we will take care of it. You won’t have to worry about the quality and deadlines
Order Paper Now
· A description of the chosen disorder and a comparison between normal brain function and the brain function of a person with the disorder
· An evaluation of the relationship between psychological and physiological aspects of the disorder and the resulting negative effects on daily functioning
· An assessment of the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder
· Recommendations for appropriate treatment options and coping mechanisms for the selected case and other people with the disorder
· Preventative measures that may be employed for others who may be at risk for the disorder
Format: The rough draft should follow these formatting guidelines: 8–10 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and citations in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
| Description of Disorder | Meets “Proficient” criteria and is substantiated through scholarly research
(9-10) |
Provides a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder, including the neurobiology of the disorder
(8) |
The description of the child/adolescent’s disorder is incomplete and lacking in detail
(7) |
Does not provide a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder
(0-6) |
10 |
| Effects of Disorder | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research
(18-20) |
Evaluates the effects of the disorder on daily functioning
(16-17) |
The evaluation of the disorder’s effects is lacking in detail and/or accuracy
(14-15) |
Does not evaluate the effects of the disorder on daily functioning
(0-13) |
20 |
| Impact of Technological Advancements | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research
(18-20) |
Assesses the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder
(16-17) |
The assessment lacks breadth and depth in the impact of technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder
(14-15) |
Does not assess the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder
(0-13) |
20 |
| Treatment Options | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended treatment options/coping mechanisms
(18-20) |
Provides recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder
(16-17) |
Recommends treatment options that are loosely aligned with the disorder
(14-15) |
Does not provide recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder
(0-13) |
20 |
Preventative Measures
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended preventative measures
(18-20) |
Provides suggestions for preventative measures that may be employed for those at risk for the disorder
(16-17) |
Recommends preventative measures that are loosely aligned with the disorder
(14-15) |
Does not provide suggestions for preventative measures
(0-13) |
20 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format
(9-10) |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax
(8) |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
(7) |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas
(0-6) |
10 |
| Earned Total
Comments: |
100% | ||||
Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
NURSING10
